Dogs Being Used to Detect SARS-CoV-2, Here’s What’s Wrong with That
By Koen Jacobs for Op V
In Germany and Finland dogs are being deployed at airports to detect SARS-CoV-2 infections. The mainstream media is hyping this as if the wheel was just invented. As good as they make this sound, there are several things wrong with this method.
Samples from volunteers and hospitalized individuals were only tested for the so-called SARS-CoV-2 virus and therefore one cannot exclude that a former infection with another coronavirus or even a flu virus resulted in false positive indications by the ‘dog detectives’ and that cross detection occurred.
According to this study “it was assumed that dogs cannot get infected by SARS-CoV-2, but recent single cases have been reported showing that dogs can get infected by SARS-CoV-2 and could potentially play a role in viral spread. There is evidence of human-to-animal transmission with a subsequent infection of dogs. It is still unclear whether dogs can function as spreaders of the virus by infecting other animals or humans. Nevertheless, this needs to be considered when using dogs for detection of infected material or people. It is also unclear how an infection in the dog will alter its sense of smell.”
This is in stark contrast to the University of Helsinki, which is leading a pilot program in Finland, its claims about dogs and SARS-CoV-2 infections:
”It is often asked if a dog can catch coronavirus. According to studies, dogs lack the receptor to which the coronavirus attaches,” says Susanna Paavilainen. She adds that there has also been no information from around the world that dogs of corona patients would have become ill.”
‘Experts’ and ‘scientists’ can’t agree on whether or not dogs can get infected with SARS-CoV-2 but they are somehow convinced that, regardless, dogs should be used to end the “pandemic.” How absurd do we really want to make this whole chapter in mankind’s enslavement?
“Some of the negative samples will be healthy, while others will have e.g. other respiratory diseases,” the University of Helsinki had to admit as well.
Of course, there’s always another catch with such developments and propositions.
The official status of corona dogs is still being clarified, so civilian dogs are used in the pilot instead of service dogs. Civilian dogs are not being trained for sniffing humans directly. Participation in testing with dogs is voluntary at this time. All passengers and airport personnel can seek to be tested. It will be possible to go over to the use of official coronavirus testing with service dogs when permitted by a change in the law.
And that’s exactly why this “corona dog” narrative is being pushed so hard. The UN clearly wants all governments to adopt new laws that would make it easier to deploy dogs, to detect “the coronavirus” – while there are more than a dozen of corona viruses to begin with.
Additionally, it’s not hard to see how governments will want to try to intimidate their population by using dogs. Although dogs are normally harmless, seeing ‘nurses’, police and military personnel walking around everywhere with dogs that can sniff you at any given time will worsen the fear culture that populations around the world are being conditioned into.
Yeah, I can see how the Death Cult would love to see dog detectives on every street corner.